A critical component for FINCH is the sensor/camera that the Payload will utilize. The objective of the trade is to determine whether the FLIR Tau SWIR is a viable option to continue with for FINCH. This trade will list alternatives as well, determining the best COTS option available .
The following requirements are referenced as drivers in this trade.
FINCH-Payload-OpticalBandwidth
FINCH-Payload-GroundSampleDistance
FINCH-Optics-RadiationTolerance
Identify the criteria that will be used to compare the different options against each other and how they will be weighed (e.g. using a scoring system or ranking). These may be qualitative or quantitative. Lower level trades should prioritize quantitative criteria over qualitative. Criteria might include factors such as cost, performance, mass, schedule, risk, and other relevant considerations.
Present a summary of the options being considered, along with their key characteristics and potential impacts. This might include information on costs, performance, schedule, risk, and other relevant factors.
Compare and contrast the different options, highlighting the tradeoffs and challenges associated with each one. Evaluate the tradeoffs qualitatively and/or quantitatively that are required in order to achieve the desired objectives, and consider using tables or graphs to visually compare the options. Data must be traceable to a source.
Provide recommendation(s) and next steps based on the findings of the tradeoff analysis. This might include a recommendation for a preferred option, and output requirements (to be added to the database).
Summarize the decision made along with its rationale after consultation with relevant stakeholders. Collect stamps of approval from representatives of each of the stakeholders in the database below: