Report can be found on the drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lsrimYv3G4Dvi5ApVPrTrGzZ_daVjQrE/view?usp=drive_link

Background information:

Tensor Tech was provided with three different scenarios to simulate:

Fixed Endpoints

No overlap

50% Overlap

Key Findings:

• Sampling rate was 10 Hz, command rate was 2 Hz
• Recommendation of LVLH then transition into target tracking
  • The pointing error in LVLH mode was 1 deg in steady state
  • transient response from LVLH to target track mode is 500 seconds
• Fixed Endpoints
  • first target becomes steady after 600 seconds (LVLH → target tracking)
  • second target becomes steady after 100 sec and holds around 0.5 degree pointing error
• 2Hz no overlap
  • same 600 seconds until steady
  • varying targets don’t cause aggressive movement so point holds around 0.3 to 0.9 degrees
• 2 Hz 50% overlap is similar to above

Follow Up Questions:

External:

• Can we know how pointing knowledge varies as well?
• Ask for the quaternion the satellite exhibits to complete these maneuvers.
• Possibly ask again about know the gains for the controller
• See if we can find out more about satellite used for this simulation