Requirements


Untitled


Final Decision

Of the three remaining options, we can eliminate the IQSpaceComm model due to lack of demonstrated flight heritage. While it is significantly cheaper, they have been extremely cagey about the true TRL, which is not a trait that is desirable when it’s such an integral part of the spacecraft.

Therefore, we have two options to choose from (specs pulled from datasheets, see above table):

Attribute SkyLabs NANOlink-2 (base) SatLab SRS-4
Size 95x91x12mm 93x87.2x17.5mm
Mass 110g 253g
Modulation Schemes Offset QPSK (OQPSK) BPSK/QPSK/8PSK
Encoding CCSDS CCSDS
RX coding BCH56 convolutional code, reed-solomon
TX coding Reed-Solomon 223, 1/2 convolutional code Reed-Solomon 223, convolutional
Data rate 4M symbols/s 5M symbols/s
Output Power Max 1W (30dBm) 20dBm-33dBm
Input Sensitivity -86dBm @4Mbps OQPSK -122dBm
TX Band 2.2-2.3GHz 2.2-2.29GHz
RX Band 2.025-2.110GHz 2.025-2.110GHz
Supply Voltage 5V 5.1V min
Power consumption 6W max, 1.9W Rx only 10.8W max, 1.5W Rx only
Interface LVDS (high speed) CAN (low speed, redundant), a few GPIO broken out CAN (slow), RS-422 (speedy), Ethernet (super speedy), future LVDS support
Connector Power + comms in one custom harness, debug headers Harwin Gecko connector, power+comms in one header, seperate headers for debug/LVDS
Price 32,950 euro 28,100 euro

We have selected the SatLab SRS-4 for the following reasons:

  1. Better transmit performance (higher gain, higher data rate)
  2. Better input sensitivity
  3. Lower standby power consumption
  4. ~5K cheaper
  5. Non-proprietary connector
  6. Can purchase a COTS antenna from them (albeit a 12K euro one, we want to design our own)